UA-47897071-1
Showing posts with label universe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label universe. Show all posts

Sunday 11 January 2015

The True Science of Parallel Universes



1 Watch the video   and put the words into the gaps in the text.
      Everyone loves the idea of parallel universes - maybe it’s the appeal of an ideal 1____ where you have second chances and things turn out differently - an alternate reality where you do get into Hogwarts and the Star Wars prequels aren’t made and you finally plug in your asymmetric computer cord correctly on the first try... But is there really a place in science for such wistful speculation? I mean, if «the universe» is everything that there is, you can’t have two 2____ of it, right? Otherwise the pair would really be everything and what you started off calling the universe, wouldn’t it? The problem here is terminology: 3_____ speaking informally often say «universe» when they really mean «4_____ universe» - that is, the part of the whole universe that we’ve so far been able to see. And it’s perfectly fine to talk about multiple different observable universes. For example, an 5____ near the edge of OUR observable universe will see parts of the Whole Universe that we cannot yet see. But that’s a well-understood question and not what physicists normally talk about when they discuss 6____ observable universes, or «multi-verses».
     So let’s cut to the chase: in physics, the word «multiverse» normally refers to one of three distinct and largely unrelated proposed physical models for the universe - none of which has been tested or confirmed by experiment, by the way. The three «multiverse» models are:
      Type 1: bubble universes or baby 7____ hole universes. This is the most 8_____ kind of multiverse. The basic idea is that perhaps there are other parts of the universe which are so far away that we will never see them (or are inside black holes so similarly we will never see them). This kind of model was created as an attempt to explain why our universe is so good at making stars and 9_____ and black holes and life. As the argument goes, if each of these separate mutually un-seeable «bubbles» in the universe had slightly different 10____ of physics, then by definition we could only exist in one that had the right physical laws to allow us to 11____. If you’re not convinced by this logic, don’t worry too much: there’s not yet any experimental 12_____ for this kind of multiverse. 
     Multiverse type 2: membranes and extra dimensions. Inspired in part by the inability of the 13_____ of string theory to 14_____ the right number of dimensions for the universe in which we live, string theorists proposed the idea that perhaps what we think of as our universe is actually just a 15______ surface embedded within a larger super-universe with 9 spatial dimensions. Kind of like how each page of a newspaper is its own two-dimensional surface 16_____ within our three-dimensional world. And of course, if space had 9 dimensions rather than three, there’d be plenty of space for other three-dimensional 17_____ that appeared, like ours, to be universes in their own right, but, like the pages of a newspaper, were actually part of a bigger whole. These kinds of surfaces are called «18_____» or «branes» for short. And as a reminder, there is not yet any experimental evidence for this kind of multiverse.
    Multiverse type 3: the many-worlds picture of 19_____ mechanics. Surprisingly, physicists still don’t fully understand how the collapse of the wavefunction in quantum mechanics happens, and the many-worlds 20_____ makes an attempt at explanation by proposing that every possible alternate 21_____ for the universe is real and they all happen in an ever-larger, ever-branching way. Like, a universal choose-your-own-adventure where every possible story happens! If this were the case, we might not realize it because we’d be stuck living out just one of the infinitely many possible lives available to us. In some ways, “many-worlds” is similar to the “bubble multiverse” model by proposing «maybe anything that can happen, does. And we just happen to exist in the series of happenings that were necessary for us to exist». If you’re still not convinced by this 22____, don’t worry: there is not yet any experimental evidence for this kind of multiverse.
     Of course if you want to get imaginative, you could also combine several of these models together into a multi-multiverse. A new super-23_____ model based, itself, on speculative and experimentally unconfirmed models. But that’s not to say we couldn’t test these multiverse 24_____. For example, if our observable universe were really just one of many disconnected bubbles or membranes and if it happened to 25____ with another bubble or membrane some time in the past, then that collision would certainly have had some sort of 26_____ on what we see when we look up at the night sky. On the other hand, the many-worlds interpretation might be 27_____ fairly soon since experimentalists are becoming increasingly able to 28______ and control ever-larger quantum mechanical systems in their labs - systems that 29_____ the line between the quantum realm and our everyday experience. So as always, we must remember that 30_____ is science, not philosophy; and in our attempts to explain the universe that we observe, we have to make 31_____ that can in principle be tested - and then test them!

multiple
observable
versions
physicists
alien
world















straightforward
laws
exist
galaxies
black
evidence




membranes
surfaces
predict
embedded
three-dimensional
mathematics





hypothesis
quantum
logic
timeline





collide
hypotheses
tested
effect
speculative
approach
claims
manipulate
physics




2 Vocabulary focus. Study the words and  word combinations, practise their translation, spelling. Check your knowledge in the test. Play vocabulary game and set your own vocabulary game record.

3 Mark the following statements as True or False.

1 String theorists proposed the idea that our universe is a three-dimensional surface.
2 Baby black holes and bubble universe models have been proved using scientific evidence.
3 Physics can describe how the collapse of wave function in quantum mechanics happens.
4 There are four models of multiverse.
5 In physics the term “force” means the same as “observable force”.

 4 Answer the Questions.
1 How many universes exist?
2 What is the most straightforward kind of multiverse?
3 What cannot physicists understand?
4 What is the second type of multiverse?
5 What would happen if our universe collided with another universe? 
6 What evidence proves the multiverse theory?


Friday 9 January 2015

Why is the Solar System Flat?



1 Watch the video and put the words into the gaps in the text.
Our Sun and the Earth, and all the planets and moons and dwarf planets and asteroids and 1____ - the solar system, in short, formed about 4.6 billion years ago from a nebulous cloud of swirling gas and dust which coalesced thanks to the irresistibly attractive force of 2____. However, this nebula started off more or less as a big 3____ blob. So how did our solar system end up with all the planets and their moons 4____ in a flat disk? I mean, we’ve all seen the planetary model of the atom, which is definitely wrong when applied to atoms, but it also kind of suggests that 5____ might revolve around the sun every which way. So is our solar system somehow special in its flatness? Or is the 6____ model of the atom doubly wrong?
Well, our solar system definitely isn’t alone, many exoplanets’ star systems are 7___, a lot of galaxies are flat, black hole accretion disks are flat, Saturn’s 8___ are flat etc. So why, when there’s all of 3D space to fill, does the universe have this preference for flatness? The answer has to do with two things: 9___ and the fact that we live in three dimensions. Bear with me. Anytime a bunch of objects held together by 10___ are zooming and circling around, their individual paths are nearly impossible to 11____, and yet, collected together they have a 12____ total amount that they spin about their center of mass. It may be hard to figure out exactly what direction that rotation is in, but the 13____ implies there must be some plane in which the cloud taken as a whole  spins.
Now, in two dimensions a cloud of particles rotating in a plane is flat by definition, it’s in two 14____. But in three dimensions, even though the rotation of the cloud is given by one plane, 15____ can whiz around far up and down from that plane. As the particles 16____ into each other, all the up and down motion tends to cancel out, its energy lost in crashing and clumping. Yet the whole mass must continue spinning 17____, because in our universe the total amount of 18____ in any isolated system always stays the same. So over time through collisions and crashes, the cloud loses its loft and flattens into a spinning, roughly 2 dimensional 19____ shape, like a solar system or a spiral galaxy.
However, in four spatial dimensions, the math works out such that there can be two separate and 20____ planes of rotation which is both really, really hard for our 3D-thinking brains to 21____ and also means there’s no up and down direction in which particles lose energy by collisions. So a cloud of particles can continue being just that... a 22____. And thus, only in three dimensions can a nebula or infant galaxy start out not flat and end up flat which is 23_____ a good thing because we need all that matter to clump together in order for stars and planets to form, and for us, even those of us who think atoms look like this, to 24_____.

shapeless
planets
comets
planetary
orbiting
gravity





gravity
single
rings
mathematics
collisions
flat
predict





bump
inexorably
dimensions
disk
spinning
particles




cloud
definitely
complementary
exist
picture


2 Vocabulary focus. Study the words and  word combinations, practise their translation, spelling. Check your knowledge in the test. Play vocabulary game and set your own vocabulary game record.

 

3 Mark the following statements as True or False.

1.     The solar system is flat.
2.     There aren’t any other planets beyond our solar system.
3.     It’s easy to predict the way of a particle in a system of many particles.
4.     The total amount of spinning in any isolated system always stays the same.
5.     It’s possible for the solar system and us to exist because of the phenomenon of flatness in three-dimensional space.
6.     The rules of mathematics are the same in three- and four- dimensional space.


4 Answer the Questions.
1.     When was the solar system formed?
2.     What objects in our universe are flat?
3.     What motion tends to cancel out in the spinning cloud of particles?
4.     What characteristic of isolated spinning system of particles always stay the same?
5.     Why is flatness of nebulas and systems of particles in general so important in our universe?